Filter This View

  • Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-09-12
    Practice Area: Expert Witnesses | Intellectual Property | Patent Litigation
    Industry: E-Commerce | Software
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Paul J. Andre, Lisa Kobialka, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Menlo Park, CA; Aaron M. Frankel, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York, NY, attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Stephen J. Kraftschik, Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael A. Tomasulo, Gino Cheng, David K. Lin, Joe S. Netikosol, Winston & Strawn LLP, Los Angeles, CA; David P. Enzminger, Louis L. Campbell, Winston & Strawn LLP, Menlo Park, CA; Dan K. Webb, Kathleen B. Barry, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL; Krista M. Enns, Winston & Strawn LLP, San Francisco, CA; Michael M. Murray, Anup K. Misra, Winston & Strawn LLP, New York, NY; Andrew R. Sommer, Thomas M. Dunham, Michael Woods, Paul N. Harold, Joseph S. Masullo, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC, attorneys for defendants.
    Case Number: D68278

    Defendant granted summary judgment of non-infringement where sale of game software did not amount to "making, using, or selling" accused game network.

  • Genedics, LLC v. Meta Co.

    Publication Date: 2018-09-05
    Practice Area: Intellectual Property | Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Burke
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David W. deBruin, The deBruin Firm, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Leslie L. Jacobs, Jr. and Gabriela I. Coman, Rubin and Rudman LLP, Washington, DC, attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: David E. Moore, Bindu A. Palapura, and Stephanie E. O'Byrne, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Craig Kaufman, Michael C. Ting, and Fatima Alloo, Techknowledge Law Group LLP, Redwood City, CA, attorneys for defendant.
    Case Number: D68271

    Motion to dismiss patent infringement complaint on grounds of non-patent-eligible subject matter denied where patent claims asserted sufficiently inventive concept overcoming obstacles of systems and processes by using existing components in more than conventional manner.

  • Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. v. ABS Capital Partners, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-06-27
    Practice Area: Contracts | Intellectual Property
    Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Laster
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, and Alan R. Silverstein, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: Raymond J. DiCamillo, Chad M. Shandler, Matthew W. Murphy, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Steven F. Barley, Andrea W. Trento, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Baltimore, MD, attorneys for defendants.
    Case Number: D68190

    Misappropriation claim failed where only circumstantial evidence involved defendant's investment in competing business, an act it was permitted to do under the parties' agreements.

  • Elenza, Inc. v. Alcon Labs. Holding Corp.

    Publication Date: 2018-04-04
    Practice Area: Contracts | Intellectual Property
    Industry: Biotechnology
    Court: Delaware Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Seitz
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Timothy J. Simeone, Charles T. Kimmett, Walter E. Anderson, and John R. Grimm, Harris, Wilshire & Grannis LLP, Washington, DC; Andrew D. Cordo and F. Troupe Mickler IV, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for appellant
    for defendant: Heidi K. Hubbard, Daniel P. Shanahan, David Randall J. Riskin, Tamara A. Rubb, and Michelle L. Hood, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC; Michael P. Kelly, Daniel M. Silver, and Benjamin P. Smyth, McCarter & English LLP, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for appellees.
    Case Number: D68096

    Misappropriation of trade secrets claim properly denied where plaintiff failed to cite specific uses of its alleged trade secrets in any claimed misappropriation by defendant.

  • Dungee v. Davison Design & Dev., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-03-14
    Practice Area: Class Actions | Intellectual Property
    Industry: Consulting
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Sleet
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: D68072

    Enhancement multiplier on lodestar amount of attorneys fees and costs unnecessary where counsel billed industry-standard rates, and where delay in payment and outlay of costs was not so excessive as to warrant compensating counsel.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Library of Pennsylvania Family Law Forms, Fourth Edition

    Authors: Joseph S. Britton

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Plastic Omnium Advanced Innovation and Research v. Donghee America, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2017-11-22
    Practice Area: Intellectual Property
    Industry: Manufacturing
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Chad S.C. Stover, Regina S.E. Murphy, Robert C. Mattson, Eric W. Schweibenz, Frank J. West, Vincent K. Shier, Christopher Ricciuti and Katherine D. Cappaert for plaintiff
    for defendant: Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, Alyssa Caridis and Nicholas H. Lam for defendants.
    Case Number: D67947

    The court construed patent terms relating to the manufacture of automotive fuel tanks.

  • Siemens Indus., Inc. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Tech. Corp.

    Publication Date: 2017-11-22
    Practice Area: Intellectual Property
    Industry: Manufacturing
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Karen Jacobs, Mark M. Supko, Kathryn L. Clune, Vincent J. Galluzzo and Jacob Z. Zambrzycki for plaintiff
    for defendant: Steven L. Caponi, Alan L. Barry, Jason A. Engel, Benjamin E. Weed, Devon C. Beane and Katherine L. Hoffee for defendants.
    Case Number: D67948

    The court issued a claim construction order in this patent infringement matter relating to multiple aspects of train safety and control.

  • MiiCs & Partners America, Inc. v. Toshiba Corp.

    Publication Date: 2017-11-08
    Practice Area: Intellectual Property
    Industry: Electronics | Hardware
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Dennis James Butler, John David Simmons, Stephen E. Murray, Keith A. Jones, Aaron Robert Ettelman, Frederick Tecce and Bryon T. Wasserman for plaintiffs
    for defendant: Robert W. Mallard, Clinton L. Conner, David Tseng and Paul T. Meiklejohn for Toshiba defendants; Benjamin J. Schladweiler, Nicholas D. Mozal, Dennies Varughese, John C. Rozendaal, Michael E. Jof-fre, Jonathan Turminaro, Daniel J. Bernard, William H. Milliken, Stephanie M. Nguyen, Zhiwei Zou, Jean Paul Y. Nagashima and Takaaki Nagashima for defendants Funai; Adam Wyatt Poff, Pilar, G. Kraman, Kevin B. Collins, Jared R. Frisch, David A. Garr, Christopher Higby, Jeffrey H. Lerner, Robert T. Halsam, Chang Sik Kim and Scott Schrader for intervenor.
    Case Number: D67930

    Defendants in this patent matter demonstrated no literal infringement by their semiconductor products.

  • MorphoSys AG v. Janssen Biotech, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2017-11-08
    Practice Area: Intellectual Property | Patent Litigation
    Industry: Biotechnology
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kelly E. Farnan, Christine D. Haynes, James F. Hurst, Patricia A. Carson, Christopher T. Jagoe and Aa-ron D. Resetarits for plaintiff
    for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Brian P. Egan, Michael A. Morin, David P. Frazier, Emily K. Sauter, Roger J. Chin and Michael R. Seringhaus for defendants.
    Case Number: D67932

    The court construed disputed terms in this patent infringement matter involving pharmaceuticals.

  • Intercept Pharm., Inc. v. Fiorucci

    Publication Date: 2017-10-11
    Practice Area: Intellectual Property
    Industry: Pharmaceuticals
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas C. Grimm, Jeremy A. Tigan, Ellen A. Scordino, Elizabeth Trafton, Ivor Elrifi, Jonathan Bach and Scott A. Sukenick for plaintiff
    for defendant: George Pazuniak and Glen M. Diehl for defendant.
    Case Number: D67900

    In this patent matter, a research scientists screening of chemical compounds was a reduction to practice and not inventorship.