Filter This View

  • D&M Holdings, Inc. v. Sonos, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-03-07
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Michael J. Flynn, John M. Jackson, Matthew C. Acosta, Blake T. Dietrich, Chris-topher J. Rourk, Robert P. Latham, David Folsom and Wasif Qureshi for plaintiffs
    for defendant: Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, George I. Lee, Sean M. Sullivan, Rory P. Shea, J. Dan Smith, Mi-chael P. Boyea, Cole B. Richter and Jae Y. Park for defendant.
    Case Number: D68065

    In this patent litigation matter, the court engaged in claim construction in connection with issues arising in defendants motions for summary judgment.

  • Nox Medical EHF v. Natus Neurology Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-02-28
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Biotechnology
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bindu A. Palapura, Chad E. Nydegger and Brent P. Lorimer for plaintiff
    for defendant: Arthur G. Connolly, III, Thomas S. Reynolds, Jeremy Adelson and Joseph J. Jacobi for defendant.
    Case Number: D68060

    In this patent matter, the court granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment of no invalidity.

  • Kraft v. Office of Chief Counsel, Div. of Veterans Affairs, North Atlantic Dist.

    Publication Date: 2018-02-21
    Practice Area: Administrative Law | Government
    Industry: Federal Government
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: N/A
    for defendant: David C. Weiss and Laura D. Hatcher for defendant.
    Case Number: D68049

    The court granted a motion to dismiss regarding a claim involving Veterans Administration benefits, because another tribunal had exclusive jurisdiction pursuant to statute.

  • TQ Delta, LLC v. 2Wire, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-02-21
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Peter J. McAndrews, Paul W. McAndrews and Rajendra A. Chiplunkar for plaintiff
    for defendant: Colm F. Connolly, Jody Barillare, Brett M. Schuman, Rachel M. Walsh and David L. Simson for defend-ant 2Wire, Inc.; Kenneth L. Dorsney, Paul M. Sykes, Melissa Hotze and Elizabeth J. Rader for defend-ants Adtran Inc. and Zyxel Communications Inc.
    Case Number: D68053

    In this claim construction matter, the court construed various terms relating to asynchronous transfer mode communications systems.

  • Ansell Healthcare Prod. LLC v. Reckitt Benckiser LLC

    Publication Date: 2018-02-14
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Consumer Products | Health Care
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Colm F. Connolly, David W. Marston, Jr., Jody C. Barillare, and John V. Goodman, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wimington, DE; Thomas B. Kenworthy and Julie S. Goldemberg, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, PA; Raymond R. Moser, Jr., Moser Taboada, Shrewsbury, NJ, attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: Adam W. Poff and Pilar G. Kraman, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilimington, DE; Douglas J. Nash, John D. Cook, Kathryn D. Cornish, Barclay Damon, LLP, Syracuse, NY, attorneys for defendant.
    Case Number: D68038

    Willful infringement and enhanced damages claim denied where defendants willful blindness to its products possible infringement of plaintiffs patents was at most a substitute for knowledge and did not constitute sufficient egregious behavior to support enhanced damages.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Massachusetts Legal Ethics & Malpractice 2017

    Authors: James S. Bolan, Sara N. Holden

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Upshur v. Hospedale

    Publication Date: 2018-01-31
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Contractual Disputes
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: D68028

    The court lacked subject matter jurisdiction where the complaint did not allege sufficient facts to support ei-ther federal question or diversity jurisdiction.

  • Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-01-31
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, and Alan Silverstein, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Paul J. Andre, Lisa Kobialka, James R. Hannah, and Hannah Lee, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP, Menlo Park, CA; Aaron M. Frankel, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP, New York, NY, attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld and Stephen J. Kraftschik, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael A. Tomasulo, Gino Cheng, David K. Lin, and Joe S. Netikosol, Winston & Strawn LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Michael M. Murray, Winston & Strawn LLP, New York, NY; David P. Enzminger, Winston & Strawn, Menlo Park, CA; Dan K. Webb and Kathleen B. Barry, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL; Thomas M. Dunham and Andrew R. Soomer, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC; Krista M. Enns, Winston & Strawn LLP, San Francisco, CA, attorneys for defendants.
    Case Number: D68022

    Patent term computer network included both multiple physical computers and multiple processes executing on a single computer, where intrinsic evidence demonstrated dependent claims which described computer network as involving processes on a single computer.

  • Jones v. USPS Postal Service

    Publication Date: 2018-01-24
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: Distribution and Wholesale | Federal Government
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: D68018

    The allegations of a complaint filed by pro se litigant were legally and factually frivolous and failed to state a claim for relief, and the court determined amendment would be futile.

  • Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.

    Publication Date: 2018-01-24
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Pharmaceuticals
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Douglas E. McCann, Martina Tyreus Hufnal, John S. Goetz, Brian D. Coggio, Ahmed J. Davis, Min Woo Park, Sarah M. Cork, Matt Colvin, D. Michael Underhill, Jon R. Knight, William D. Marsillo, Alex Potter, Bill Ward and Martin Ellison for plaintiffs
    for defendant: Arthur G. Connolly III, Ryan P. Newell, Mary Akhimien, Raymond N. Nimrod, Brian P. Biddinger, Gregory D. Bonifield, John P. Galanek, Amanda K. Antons and Matthew Traupman for defendant.
    Case Number: D68021

    The court engaged in claim construction in this patent litigation matter involving ten patents relating to phar-maceuticals for treating diabetes and pen-type injectors used to administer the drug.

  • Newsome v. Lawson

    Publication Date: 2018-01-17
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Discovery
    Industry: Legal Services
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Laura Davis Jones, James E. O'Neill, Ali M.M. Mojdehi and Janet Dean Gertz for plaintiff
    for defendant: James W. Semple, Paula J. Quillin and Joseph R. Farris for defendants.
    Case Number: D68011

    Attorneys who formerly engaged in joint representation were not allowed to withhold documents based on a non-party joint clients objection to disclosure, and the attorney-client privilege did not apply to communications relevant to the matter of common interest for which they were retained as joint attorneys.