• TQ Delta, LLC v. 2Wire, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2019-05-01
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan and Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Peter J. McAndrews, Thomas J. Wimbiscus, James P. Murphy, Paul W. McAndrews, Anna M. Targowska and Rajendra Chiplunkar, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd., Chicago, IL for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Jody C. Barillare, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Brett Schuman, Rachel M. Walsh and Monte M.F. Cooper, Goodwin Procter LLP, San Francisco for defendant.

    Case Number: D68548

    In this patent infringement action, the court granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment of no invalidity as to patent eli-gibility and indefiniteness, but it denied the remainder of the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment.

  • CIGNEX Datamatics, Inc. v. Lam Research Corp.

    Publication Date: 2019-03-27
    Practice Area: Contracts | Litigation
    Industry: Consulting | Software
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Theodore A. Kittila and James G. McMillan, III, Halloran Farkas + Kittila LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Christopher P. Simon and David G. Holmes, Cross & Simon, LLC, Wilmington, DE for defendants.

    Case Number: D68504

    Plaintiff owed duty to preserve emails of former employees from the point defendant threatened legal action, but defendant failed to show plaintiff acted in bad faith or to deny evidence to defendant in support of an order of sanctions.

  • Angelo v. NVR, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2019-03-27
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ronald Angelo, Sr., Townsend, DE, pro se plaintiff.
    for defendant: Scott G. Wilcox, Whiteford Taylor Preston, LLC, Wilmington, DE for defendant NVR, Inc. Scott Thomas Earle, Zarwin, Baum, DeVito, Kaplan, Schaer, Toddy, P.C., Wilmington, DE for defendant Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company.

    Case Number: D68502

    Plaintiff lacked standing to litigate title issues pro se on behalf of principal as an attorney-in-fact.

  • Heritage Handoff Holdings, LLC v. Fontanella

    Publication Date: 2019-03-20
    Practice Area: Business Torts | Securities Litigation
    Industry: Automotive | Manufacturing
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John A. Sensing, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Dylan P. Kletter and Kelsey D. Bond, Brown Rudnick LLP, Hartford, CT for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Dominick T. Gattuso and Aaron M. Nelson, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Marc J. Kurzman; Peter M. Nolin and Damian K. Gunningsmith, Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey LLP, Stamford, CT and New Haven, CT for defendant.

    Case Number: D68501

    Purchaser was entitled to recover on its securities fraud claim based on evidence of misrepresentations and omissions, but its common law fraud claim was precluded by the bootstrapping doctrine.

  • Harvey v. Berryhill

    Publication Date: 2019-02-27
    Practice Area: Administrative Law
    Industry: Federal Government
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Tammy Harvey, Felton, DE, pro se plaintiff. Eric P. Kressman, Regional Counsel, and Annie Kernicky, Assistant Deputy Regional Counsel, Office of the Regional Chief, Social Security Administration, Philadelphia, PA; David C. Weiss, U.S. Attorney for the District of Delaware, Wilmington, DE
    for defendant: Heather Benderson, Special Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Philadelphia, PA for defendant.

    Case Number: D68472

    Claimant not entitled to SSI benefits, where substantial evidence supported the conclusion that her disability was caused by her alcoholism, since the Social Security Act precluded benefits for claimants disabled by alcoholism or drug addiction.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New York Employment Law 2023

    Authors: Daniel A. Cohen, Joshua Feinstein

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Rodriguez v. Metzger

    Publication Date: 2019-02-13
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian L. Arban, Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE for respondents.
    for defendant: N/A

    Case Number: D68460

    The court denied petitioner's habeas corpus relief because he failed to establish that his guilty plea was not entered voluntarily.

  • Baggage Airline Guest Serv., Inc. v. Roadie, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2019-01-23
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Cargo and Shipping | Transportation
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Neal Belgam and Eve Ormerod, Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP, Wilmington, DE; Stefan V. Stein, Mayanne Downs, Jason Zimmerman and Cole Carlson, Gray Robinson P.A., Orlando, FL for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Pilar G. Kraman, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Edward A. Pennington, John P. Moy, John P. Pen-nington and Darlene K. Tzou, Smith, Gambrell & Russell LLP, Washington, DC for defendant.

    Case Number: D68434

    Patent claims for a baggage delivery system involved an abstract idea and did not contain any inventive concept.

  • Alarm.com, Inc. v. Securenet Tech. LLC

    Publication Date: 2019-01-23
    Practice Area: Expert Witnesses | Patent Litigation
    Industry: E-Commerce
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Mary B. Matterer and Kenneth L. Dorsney, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE; Ian R. Liston, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Wilmington, DE; James C. Yoon, Ryan R. Smith, Christopher D. Mays and Mary A. Procaccio-Flowers, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Palo Alto, CA for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld and Stephen J. Kraftschik, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Erik B. Milch and Frank Pietrantonio, Cooley LLP, Reston, VA; Rose Whelan and Naina Soni, Cooley LLP, Washington, DC for defendant.

    Case Number: D68433

    Portions of defendant's motion to exclude an expert's lost profit opinion went to the weight and not the admissibility of the evidence, but the court excluded other parts of the expert's testimony.

  • Farrington v. Silva

    Publication Date: 2019-01-16
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael F. McTaggart, Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE for defendants Silva and O'Bara.
    for defendant: N/A

    Case Number: D68425

    Plaintiff's motion to amend was untimely and he did not show good cause for the delay.

  • Takeda Pharm., U.S.A. v. West-Ward Pharm Corp.

    Publication Date: 2019-01-09
    Practice Area: Damages | Patent Litigation
    Industry: Pharmaceuticals
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Mary W. Bourke and Daniel M. Attaway, Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jeffrey I. Weinberger, Ted G. Dane, Heather E. Takahashi, Elizabeth L. Laughton, Hannah L. Dubina, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, CA Celia R. Choy and Peter A. Detre, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Dominick T. Gattuso, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Lauren C. Tortorella, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL, Charles B. Klein and Ilan Wurman, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC; Elaine H. Blais, Robert D. Carroll, Lana S. Shiferman, Robyn R. Schwartz and Louis L. Lobel, Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA for defendants.

    Case Number: D68421

    Defendants were entitled to damages for lost profits under a bond where the court improperly granted a preliminary re-straining order.