Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
1,483 results for '* court:"Delaware Superior Court"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2022-12-13
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Biotechnology
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Valihura
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Mary F. Dugan, Lauren E.M. Russell, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Robert W. Capobianco, Adriana R. Midence, Kelli N. Church, Jackson Lewis P.C., Atlanta, GA for appellants.
for defendant: Bruce W. McCullough, Bodell Bove, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Salmeh K. Fodor, Kristoffer V. Sargent, KF Law, LLC, Atlanta, GA for appellees.
Case Number: 382, 2021
The court affirmed in part and reversed in part a cross-appeal arising out of a corporate litigation claim.
Publication Date: 2022-12-13
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Biotechnology | Health Care | Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Butler
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael W. McDermott, David B. Anthony, Berger Harris LLP, Wilmington, DE; Bryan J. Wick, Jack Lilley, Wick Phillips Gould & Martin, LLP, Dallas TX for plaintiff.
for defendant: Blake Rohrbacher, Samuel J. Gray, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Matthew Messerli, The Messerli Law Firm, Trophy Club, TX for defendant.
Case Number: N21C-12-131 CEB
Suit for wages and severance pay was not dismissed where employer identified no condition precedent to terminated employee's right to receive wages, and where there were outstanding issues of material fact concerning whether employer had materially breached the parties' contract, entitling employee to receive separation pay.
Publication Date: 2022-12-13
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Rennie
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1712008053
Motion for postconviction relief failed where defendant could not show that newly discovered eyewitness with testimony supporting a claim of self-defense would have altered the outcome of the trial as such testimony did not establish defendant's actual innocence, particularly where the testimony could not explain why defendant continued to use force and robbed the victim.
Publication Date: 2022-12-06
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Health Care
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Primos
Attorneys: For plaintiff: M. Denise Tolliver, Camden, DE, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: Tiffany R. Hubbard, Pamela Moore, McCarter & English, LLP, Hartford, CT; Chelsea A. Botsch, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, Delaware for defendants.
Case Number: K21C-06-040 NEP
The court found for defendant corporation in an employment litigation sounding in discrimination and defamation claims.
Publication Date: 2022-11-29
Practice Area: Legal Malpractice
Industry: Legal Services | Real Estate
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Melissa Freeman, D. Robert Freeman, appellants pro se.
for defendant: Jeffrey M. Weiner, The Law Offices of Jeffrey M. Weiner, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Donald L. Gouge, Jr., Wilmington, DE, attorneys for appellees.
Case Number: N21C-09-081 EMD
Contract and indemnification claims against real estate attorney failed where there was no evidence indicating the existence of a contractual or attorney-client relationship between the attorney and sellers, as the attorney expressly advised sellers that she was representing the buyers.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Jonathan H. Lomurro, Gary L. Riveles, Abbott S. Brown
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2022-11-22
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry:
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Primos
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Catherine Di Lorenzo, Stern & Eisenberg Mid-Atlantic, PC, Newark, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Donald L. Gouge, Jr., Donald L. Gouge, Jr., LLC, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: K21C-08-007 NEP
Failure to timely effect a transfer of an action from justice of the peace court to superior court required dismissal of the case with prejudice pursuant to the terms of the justice of the peace court's order.
Publication Date: 2022-11-22
Practice Area: Insurance Law
Industry: Insurance
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Donald L. Gouge, Jr., Donald L. Gouge, Jr., LLC, Wilmington, DE; Joseph M. Kelleher, Cozen O’Connor, Philadelphia, PA for plaintiff.
for defendant: David P. Primack, McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Eric A. Biderman, James M. Westerlind, Julius A. Rousseau Arent Fox LLP, New York, NY for defendant.
Case Number: N20C-05-144 EMD CCLD
The court granted plaintiff estate's motion for summary judgment on the grounds that defendant corporation was not entitled to collect decedent's life insurance proceeds because under 18 Del. C. §2704, the insurance policy was void due to lack of an insurable interest.
Publication Date: 2022-11-22
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Carpenter
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joseph J. Rhoades, Stephen T. Morrow, Rhoades & Morrow LLC, Wilmington, DE; Michael A. Trunk, Thomas E. Bosworth, Kline & Spector, P.C., Philadelphia, PA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Timothy Jay Houseal, Jennifer M. Kinkus, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Anthony M. Pisciotti, Danny C. Lallis, Pisciotti Lallis Erdreich, Florham Park, NJ for defendants.
Case Number: N17C-11-264 WCC
Court correctly precluded plaintiffs' expert from testifying that a new weapon design was evidence of an alternative feasible design for a prior version of the weapon designed decades ago since such evidence would ignore the normal progress of technological development.
Publication Date: 2022-11-15
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Retail
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Johnston
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Andrew L. Cole, Jack M. Dougherty, Cole Schotz, P.C., Wilmington, DE; Steven L. Klepper, Brendan P. Barry, Cole Schotz, P.C., Hackensack, NJ for plaintiff.
for defendant: Patricia R. Urban, Megan I. Brison, Pinckney, Weidinger, Urgan & Joyce LLC, Wilmington, DE; Eric B. Fisher, Sarah Dowd, Binder & Schwartz LLP, New York, NY; Anna E. Currier, James G. Gorman III, Blank Rome LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jason A. Snyderman, Charles A. Fitzpatrick, Blank Rome LLP, Philadelphia, PA; Shawna J. Henry, Blank Rome, Pittsburgh, PA for defendants.
Case Number: N21C-12-175 MMJ CCLD
Anti-reliance/non-recourse provisions of purchase agreement did not bar fraud claims against non-signatories where plaintiff sufficiently alleged that those parties were complicit in the contracting party's misrepresentations.
Publication Date: 2022-11-08
Practice Area: Administrative Law
Industry:
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Primos
Attorneys: For plaintiff: John W. Paradee, Stephen A. Spence, Brian V. Demott, Mackenzie M. Peet, Baird Mandalas Brockstedt, LLC, Dover, DE for appellant.
for defendant: Frederick A. Townsend, III, Hudson, Jones, Jaywork & Fisher, Dover, DE; Craig T. Eliassen, Schmittinger & Rodriguez, P.A., Dover, DE for appellee.
Case Number: K22A-02-003 NEP
Court reversed the decision of the county's zoning board finding that their denial of an application to construct an "accessory cottage," was inconsistent with the plain and unambiguous meaning of the zoning code. Although the zoning board argued that the application should be denied because it would require the construction of a new building rather than an addition to an already existing outbuilding, the court noted that this was inconsistent with the code which made no mention of whether an outbuilding could be constructed to qualif
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read