Jay Sadd (left) and John E. Hall
The unanimous opinion said jurors were allowed to rule on both medical malpractice and ordinary negligence, but the resulting "general verdict" did not specify which standard they applied.
March 06, 2018 at 04:14 PM
1 minute read
staff reporter
The Georgia Supreme Court tossed out a $22 million medical malpractice verdict Monday, ordering a retrial after concluding the defendant doctor was held to an improper evidentiary standard.
The unanimous opinion said the jury was allowed to rule on both medical malpractice and ordinary negligence, a lower standard under which any layperson without medical training would have realized something was wrong during the medical procedure at the heart of the case.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
Duane Morris seeks an associate with 3-4 years of experience to join its Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Group in its Philadelp...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
