"The business amenity offered by defendants, namely, the 'tree swing' referenced here, was an unreasonably dangerous condition on the premises because the tree limb to which it was anchored was fragile, rotten, or otherwise incapable of supporting any meaningful weight load," read the plaintiff complaint.
July 18, 2022 at 06:22 PM
5 minute read
Litigation Reporter
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia might soon decide who’s to blame when a guest gets injured at an Airbnb property.
A Florida man has brought a premises liability lawsuit against the San Francisco-based vacation rental company and a pair of its hosts, after a ride on a tree swing at a Georgia property left him injured.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Tree swing; U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia case 2:22-cv-00134, Smith v. Coppage et. al (Courtesy photo)
(Photo: Airbnb Lim/Shutterstock.com)
