Ga. Supreme Court's First Zoom Arguments to Run Monday Through Thursday
For its first-ever remote oral arguments, the Georgia Supreme Court will hear appeals of several murder convictions plus, a personal injury lawsuit against a sheriff over a deputy's car crash and a legal malpractice case against an appellate lawyer.
April 17, 2020 at 06:08 PM
5 minute read
For the first time since the new coronavirus pandemic emergency started, the Georgia Supreme Court will hear oral arguments next week—but like a lot of things these days, they won't look the same.
The justices will consider appeals of several murder convictions plus, a personal injury lawsuit against a sheriff over a deputy's car crash and a legal malpractice case against an appellate lawyer. It sounds like business as usual. And the arguments will be livestreamed on the court website, as always. But instead of sitting together on their bench with the lawyers arguing before them, the justices' faces will show up separately on a Zoom teleconference call, as will the lawyers arguing.
Chief Justice Harold Melton extended the statewide judicial emergency April 6. The new order runs until May 13, extending by a month the one Melton signed on March 14, which was due to expire April 13. Both orders close the courts to all but essential functions in order to control the spread of COVID-19. At the same time, the courts are ordered to remain open to deal with matters that are critical or "essential" to protect the "health, safety, and liberty of individuals."
Melton announced on March 27 that the court would hold its first ever oral arguments by videoconference next week. "We are committed to continuing the court's business with as little disruption as possible," Melton said then. "Thankfully, we now have the technology that makes this possible."
Starting Monday and continuing through Thursday, attorneys will argue 19 cases before eight justices, who rather than being seated on the bench in the new Nathan Deal Judicial Center, will be seated for the most part in their homes. Only Melton will take his seat on the bench in the new courtroom. The court will use the videoconferencing service called Zoom.
"This is a first for us," Melton said. "So please be patient if we run into some technological glitches. Hopefully, it will go off without a hitch. That is our goal."
The high court won't be the first one in the state to Zoom in.
Judge C. LaTain "Tain" Kell of the Cobb Superior Court called his intermediate drug court to order March 25 while sitting at the bench in an empty courtroom wearing latex gloves. The session lasted until the battery on his cell phone died. And no one spread any virus. Drug court participants, counselors and staff had all downloaded the Zoom video call app on their smartphones and joined a meeting that Kell hosted.
"We're trying something new here today," Kell told the group. "But the point is still the same. We're here for you."
The Georgia Court of Appeals will soon follow, Judge Stephen Dillard (@JudgeDillard) said Friday by tweet. Dillard said the Fourth Division, which includes himself and Judges Brian Rickman and Trent Brown, will hold oral arguments via Zoom on May 5, 2020, at 10:30 a.m. Those arguments also will be posted to watch on the court's livestream.
Many other courts of last resort around the country either are doing the same or soon will, Chief Justice Nathan Hecht of the Texas Supreme Court said Friday. He is chairman of the National Center for State Courts and president of the national Conference of Chief Justices. The Center for State Courts said Friday that those in Arizona, California, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia have used videoconferencing technology to gather justices and attorneys. Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Wisconsin and Wyoming have announced they will be using video technology for their upcoming oral arguments. Several other states either have (Alaska, Missouri, Vermont, Virginia) or soon will (Connecticut, Nebraska) use teleconferencing for oral arguments. In most cases, either live audio or video feeds of the hearings are made available to the public, with some courts providing a recording shortly after the proceeding is completed.
"The COVID-19 pandemic has required many adjustments to the justice system," Hecht said in his opening remarks of the first remote hearings held by the Texas Supreme Court. "Rather than proceed without argument, we have decided to proceed through remote connections." Hecht said he anticipates that the surge to videoconferencing brought on by the coronavirus is forever changing how courts do business. "I can't imagine that it's not going to outlast the pandemic and change the way we do business generally, pretty profoundly," he said.
Meanwhile, the duration of the pandemic remained uncertain. Georgia public health leaders forecast a peak in early May. At noon Friday, the total number of cases rose to 17,194, with 3,324 people hospitalized and 650 deaths, according to the Georgia Department of Public Health COVID-19 Daily Status Report.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDLA Piper Names Corporate Lawyer Gerry Williams as Co-US Managing Partner
3 minute readNarrow Exception to Workers' Compensation Act Revives Wrongful-Death Suit
8 minute readStuckey's Leader Using Skills as Georgia Lawyer to Help Revive Iconic Brand
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 4Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 5Inside Track: Late-Career In-House Leaders Offer Words to Live by
Who Got The Work
Eleanor M. Lackman of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp has entered an appearance for Canon, the Japanese camera maker, and the Brooklyn Nets in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Sept. 16 in California Central District Court by T-Rex Law on behalf of technology company Phinge Corporation, pursues claims against the defendants for their ongoing use of the 'Netaverse' mark. The suit contends that the defendants' use of the mark in connection with a virtual reality platform will likely create consumer confusion. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, is 2:24-cv-07917, Phinge Corporation v. Yankees Entertainment and Sports Network, LLC et al.
Who Got The Work
Fox Rothschild partner Glenn S. Grindlinger has entered an appearance for Garage Management Company in a pending lawsuit over alleged wage-and-hour violations. The case was filed Aug. 31 in New York Southern District Court by the Abdul Hassan Law Group on behalf of a manual worker who contends that he was not properly compensated for overtime hours worked. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres, is 1:24-cv-06610, Bailey v. Garage Management Company LLC.
Who Got The Work
Veronica M. Keithley of Stoel Rives has entered an appearance for Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC in a pending environmental lawsuit. The suit, filed Aug. 12 in Washington Western District Court by Kampmeier & Knutsen on behalf of Communities for a Healthy Bay, seeks to declare that the defendant has violated the Clean Water Act by releasing stormwater discharges on Puget Sound and Commencement Bay. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle, is 3:24-cv-05662, Communities for a Healthy Bay v. Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC.
Who Got The Work
Caroline Pignatelli of Cooley has entered an appearance for law firm Cooley, partner Matt Hallinan, retired partner Michael Tu and a pair of Cooley associates in a pending fraud lawsuit related to the firm's representation of startup company Carbon IQ and founder Benjamin Cantey. The case, filed Sept. 26 in New Jersey District Court by the DalCortivo Law Offices on behalf of Gould Ventures and member Jason Gould, contends that the defendants deliberately or recklessly concealed critical information from the plaintiffs regarding fraud allegations against Cantey. Gould claims that he would not have accepted a position on Carbon IQ's board of directors or made a 2022 investment in the company if the fraud allegations had been disclosed. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Robert Kirsch, is 3:24-cv-09485, Gould Ventures, LLC et al v. Cooley, LLP et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom have stepped in to represent PDD Holdings, the operator of online marketplaces Pinduoduo and Temu, in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Sept. 30 in New York Eastern District Court by Labaton Keller Sucharow and VanOverbeke, Michaud & Timmony, contends that the defendants concealed information that rendered the growth of PDD unsustainable and posed substantial risks to PDD’s business, including merchant policies that made it unprofitable for vendors to do business on PDD platforms; malware issues on PDD applications; and PDD’s failure to implement effective compliance systems. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-06881, Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund v. Pdd Holdings Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250