A plaintiff in a defamation suit over anonymous postings on a Google-hosted blog may not obtain the writers’ names, a New Jersey appeals court ruled in upholding a trial judge who quashed a subpoena.

Because the statements concerned a public figure and a matter of public concern, the statements were non-actionable “rhetorical hyberbole,” the Appellate Division said.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]