An attorney should have “conducted his own research to determine whether he was in compliance with the rules of procedure,” the Florida Supreme Court ruled, since the respondent had more than 25 years of experience practicing law.
November 11, 2022 at 02:09 PM
4 minute read
The Florida Supreme Court ruled that an attorney who sent a subpoena that was different from the one for which he’d provided notice must face a stiffer sentence for behavior that was “destructive to the legal system as a whole.”
The respondent, Odiator Arugu of the Florida Law Firm in Orlando, represented George Rodriguez in a divorce proceeding.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Florida Supreme Court Building. (Credit: vasanth/Adobe Stock)
