The dispute centered around settlement money from a legal malpractice lawsuit. Photo: kentoh/Shutterstock.com.
"The old adage 'you can’t change the rules in the middle of the game' accurately sets the scene in a series of hearings conducted before the probate court giving rise to this appeal," the opinion began.
April 29, 2020 at 05:01 PM
1 minute read
The Fourth District Court of Appeal waded into a fight over the distribution of an $800,000 legal malpractice settlement Wednesday when it found three family members had missed their chance to duck out of the agreement.
“The old adage ‘you can’t change the rules in the middle of the game’ accurately sets the scene in a series of hearings conducted before the probate court giving rise to this appeal,” the opinion began.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
