“Do not blame anybody for your mistakes and failures”—good advice from Bernard Baruch, trusted adviser to President Franklin D. Roosevelt. This article asks the question: Should a liability insurer in Florida be allowed to blame retained defense counsel for the insurer’s bad faith? The answer is no. Both public policy and practical considerations, as expressed by the courts and legislature, provide that an insurer’s obligations of good faith are personal to the insurer and nondelegable. Florida courts should not sanction the transfer of the insurers’ good faith obligations to defense counsel.

A related issue is currently before the Florida Supreme Court. In Arch Insurance v. Kubicki Draper, the court will decide whether a liability insurer has standing to sue defense counsel for legal malpractice. Under Florida law, generally only clients have the right to sue an attorney for malpractice. The lower courts held that Arch, who was not the client, lacked standing to sue defense counsel. Arch argues that it is the injured party and that the lower courts’ rulings allow negligent defense counsel to escape responsibility.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]