Employer Alert: DOL Issues Final Rule Extending Overtime to Over 1 Million Employees
The Department of Labor estimates the change will make about 1.2 million employees who are exempt from overtime under the current rule entitled to overtime pay.
September 26, 2019 at 04:18 PM
4 minute read
Lindsay Massillon, left, and Elizabeth Johnson, Fowler White Burnett
The Department of Labor announced Tuesday that it will finally be implementing changes to the white-collar overtime exemption contained in the Fair Labor Standards Act.
The exemption, which generally applies to those who work in an executive, administrative or professional capacity, has not been modified since April 2004. Under the law, a person would be considered exempt from overtime at time and one-half pay if that person met each of the following criteria: the employee is paid a predetermined and fixed salary that is not subject to reduction based on quantity or quality of work under the salary basis test, the amount of the salary met a minimum amount under a salary level test and the employee's job duties primarily involve executive, administrative or professional duties under the duties test.
Since 2004, the salary level test has been met if the employee earned at least $455 per week, which was about the 20th percentile of full-time salaried employees in the South and within the retail industry nationally.
The DOL sought to set a threshold salary where most people who made at least that much per week fell into the category of either an executive, administrative or professional employee as those terms are defined under the regulations (29 CFR Part 541). However, millions of Americans earn at least $23,660 per year and therefore were not entitled to overtime pay.
In an effort to reconcile the rule with the current economic realities, in 2016 the Obama administration proposed a change to the minimum threshold salary amount to $913 per week, or $47,476 annually. The final rule published in May 2016 was challenged in court, and ultimately the DOL was enjoined from implementing the 2016 final rule by a Texas U.S. district judge.
The DOL subsequently proposed a modified salary level of $679 per week, or $35,308 annually, which was derived using the same method as the 2004 salary level but using current statistics. After a comment period where there were over 116,000 comments, the DOL announced that, effective Jan. 1, 2020, this new minimum salary requirement for executive, professional and administrative employees will be set at $679 per week.
The DOL estimates that this change will make about 1.2 million employees who are currently exempt from overtime under the current rule entitled to overtime pay. The final rule also changes the salary threshold for the highly compensated employee, or HCE, exemption from $100,000 annually to $147,414 annually. This change is expected to provide overtime eligibility to approximately 100,000 employees who currently are considered exempt under the HCE exemption.
The DOL may face litigation related to the implementation. However, it appears that an increase to the salary threshold for white collar employees is inevitable, whether it occurs on Jan. 1 or later.
Employers are encouraged to assess their workforce now to determine what changes need to be made. The biggest changes will need to be made with regard to employees currently classified as exempt who work substantial amounts of overtime and whose compensation is now below the new salary threshold.
Note that the new rule permits employers to count nondiscretionary bonuses and incentive payments towards up to 10% of the salary threshold so long as those bonuses are paid at least annually.
Assuming these employees meet both the salary basis and duties tests, but make less than $679 per week, employers have a couple of options. First, employers can increase the employee's salary to the new minimum. Alternatively, employers can change the employee to an hourly employee, thus making the employee nonexempt. The employee's hourly rate can be adjusted downward to allow for additional overtime pay that the employee would now be entitled to receive.
Employers should also be on the lookout for the announcement of other final rules which will make further changes to the FLSA. A notice was issued in March which sought comments on a proposed rule amending 29 CFR Part 778 related to how an employee's "regular rate" is calculated. The comment period has closed, and a final rule on this issue is expected in the coming months.
Elizabeth P. Johnson is a shareholder at Fowler White Burnett in Miami, where she focuses on labor and employment Law. Contact her at [email protected]. Lindsay M. Massillon is a Miami associate focused on labor and employment law and commercial litigation. Contact her at LMassillon@fowler-white.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute read
US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute read

Read the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250