Judge Digs Into Medicaid Contract Disputes
A legal showdown over contracts in Florida's multibillion-dollar Medicaid program started Monday in an administrative court.The stakes are high…
August 28, 2018 at 04:41 PM
4 minute read
A legal showdown over contracts in Florida's multibillion-dollar Medicaid program started Monday in an administrative court.
The stakes are high as the state prepares to transition Medicaid managed-care patients to new plans chosen in the latest round of contracting.
In a small courtroom a mile down the road from the state Capitol, attorneys for the AIDS Healthcare Foundation and two South Florida hospital districts asked a judge to either require new bids or to award new contracts in a dispute about what are known as “specialty” contracts in the Medicaid managed-care system.
A subsidiary of the AIDS Healthcare Foundation and the South Florida Community Care Network, jointly owned by the hospital districts, filed the challenges after they were denied contracts.
The attorneys told Administrative Law Judge John Newton that, among other things, the state didn't assign enough staff to properly evaluate the plans' responses to the Medicaid managed-care invitation to negotiate and, as a result, they weren't properly scored. An invitation to negotiate, or ITN, is a bid-like process often used by government agencies.
AIDS Healthcare Foundation attorney Brian Newman pointed to the staffing problems. While there were more than 67,000 items that plans were required to respond to, Newman alleged that AHCA at the last minute removed some items from review because of lack of time.
“When they say that all the scoring was completed that's only half true,” Newman said. “The scoring was completed only because they reduced the number of items that had to be scored.”
The South Florida Community Care Network, jointly owned by the North Broward and South Broward hospital districts, also argued that state law requires AHCA to contract with so-called “provider sponsored networks” when possible.
The new contracts have the potential to upend health care for HIV and AIDS patients in South Florida who are members of Positive Health Care, the managed-care plan owned by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation.
But attorneys for the Agency for Care Administration argued that the ITN, like sports, is competitive, with winners and losers.
“It's not a game, but it is a competition,” said Joe Goldstein, an attorney with the firm Shutts & Bowen who is representing the state.
AHCA has gone through a lengthy re-procurement process that starred in 2017 to award new contracts. Initially, the state announced in April that it would sign five-year Medicaid contracts with nine managed care plans. The initial announcement drew the threat of legal challenges from a number of plans.
AHCA eventually negotiated agreements with an additional four companies, announcing this summer that it would sign five-year contracts with 13 managed care plans. But the decision still left Positive Health Care shut out of Broward and Miami Dade counties.
And while the South Florida Community Care Network, which operates as Community Care Network, was picked to provide so-called “managed medical assistance” or traditional health care to people in Broward County, it wasn't chosen by the state to provide specialty care to people with HIV, people with serious mental illness or children with special health care needs.
The challenges, along with cases filed by Magellan Complete Care about providing care to people with mental illness, were consolidated into one case. Newton began hearing the case Monday.
But in lieu of an opening statement, Tallahassee attorney Steve Ecenia announced that Magellan Complete Care was voluntarily dismissing its challenges. Details were not immediately available, but a settlement agreement will include a Medicaid award for Magellan, Ecenia told The News Service of Florida.
The settlement agreement won't impact the challenges filed by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation and the South Florida Community Care Network.
State lawmakers in 2011 approved an overhaul of the Medicaid program that requires most beneficiaries to enroll in HMOs or other types of managed-care plans.
AHCA launched the program in 2013 after signing five-year contracts with health plans across the 11 regions. It began reprocurement efforts in 2017, issuing an invitation to negotiate with managed-care plans that want new five-year contracts.
After months of reviews and negotiations AHCA announced the 13 managed care plans it intends to contract with. In aggregate, the five-year contracts are expected to be worth about $90 billion, one top-ranking Medicaid official has said. That number could be low, though, because the program, which provides health care to more than 3.2 million Floridians, has cost the state more than $25 billion annually.
Christine Sexton reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFreeman Mathis & Gary Taps Orlando for Third New Florida Office This Year
3 minute readFla.'s Statute of Limitations and Statutes of Repose in Med Mal Cases: It's Not Over Until It's Over
6 minute readGC of Florida State Agency Steps Down After Threatening TV Stations That Aired Abortion-Rights Ad
Trending Stories
- 1Ruling Ends Lengthy Court of Appeals Election Challenge
- 2The Legal Marketer’s Guild to Gift Giving
- 3'A Never-Ending Nightmare': Apple Sued for Alleged Failure to Protect Child Sexual Abuse Survivors
- 4Judge Awards $200K in Attorney Fees Following $80K Employment Discrimination Award
- 5Managing the Ladder: An Overview of Modern Equitable Subrogation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250