Cuban American Bar Association Raises Concerns Over Florida Bar Trip to Cuba
CABA objects to fees and requests for additional information from natives of Cuba.
July 19, 2018 at 04:19 PM
4 minute read
The Cuban American Bar Association has published two open letters expressing reservations about plans for two law-related trips to Cuba.
Penned by CABA president Jorge L. Piedra, the letters are addressed to the international law section of the Florida Bar and continuing legal education provider SimplyCLE, which are planning separate trips this fall.
In his letter to the bar section, Piedra, who has been on CABA's board of directors for nine years, notes the “differential treatment” being given to Cuban-born bar members and others who'd like to attend the trip scheduled for Oct. 19-22. Piedra quotes the fine print accompanying promotional material, which reads, “Cuban born travelers, please contact Cuba Cultural Travel prior to mailing your deposit and registration form. Fees associated with special visas for Cuban born travelers are not included.”
The notation refers to a special permit needed for Cuba-born foreigners to travel into the country. Piedra said the permit requires an additional fee and additional personal information not requested of others. The Cuban-American visitors would have to provide a “reference in Cuba (must know exact name and address).”
“It's outright discrimination against Cuban-born members of the Florida Bar,” Piedra told the Daily Business Review. “It's part of the Cuban government's scheme to discriminate against Cuban-born people who have become U.S. citizens.”
“We have issues with any trip that discriminates against one member of the Florida Bar against any other. In this case it happens to be Cuban-born members.”
The letter also mentions concerns he and other CABA members have about Cuba's human rights record.
“Another significant concern is the branding of this excursion as a 'cross-cultural educational exchange,' with a glaring absence of any education on the disgraceful human rights issues facing Cubans on the island,” the letter reads. “The cast of 'prominent' members that the ILS has selected to 'educate' members of our Bar fails to include even one member of the Cuban dissident movement or one human rights activist.”
Piedra said he and CABA are not trying to get the trip canceled or keep members from attending.
Piedra's letter to SimplyCLE articulates many of the same points made and raises questions about the legality of the trip. The letter cites SimplyCLE's marketing material touting the Cuba CLE seminar set Sept. 17-21 as a “vacation.”
The U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control limit Cuba visits by Americans to “official business of U.S. government, foreign government and certain intergovernmental organizations; journalistic activity; professional research; educational activities.”
Carlos Federico Osorio, the chair of the bar section, noted its ultimate function is to enable cultural and legal exchanges. With that in mind, the upcoming trip to Cuba — its third to the island — fulfills its mission.
“All of our missions have been done tactfully as a lawyer-to-lawyer exchange; it's for the profession,” Osorio said. “It's something that our members want, some of whom are CABA members. We've spoken with Piedra directly; we've always taken their concerns into consideration.”
As a Nicaraguan expatriate, Osorio said he empathizes with the apprehensions expressed by Piedra and CABA.
“I understand Mr. Piedra's concerns, but my perspective is you shouldn't refuse to travel to a place if you want to learn more about it,” Osorio said. “We're lawyers going on an educational and professional exchange. We're not diplomats. We don't set policy.”
Attorney James Michael Meyer — treasurer of the international law section and co-chair of its Cuba committee — disputed CABA's contention that the itinerary doesn't address Cuba's human rights, citing the involvement of Cuban dissident Rene de Jesus Gomez Manzano on previous trips.
“Every minute of the day is filled with substantive content, with human rights being a focus of discussion,” Meyer told the DBR. “One of the primary purposes for these visits is to promote professional exchange but also to interact with the Cuban people, including dissidents on the island.”
Meyer said the section does not sanction any violations of rules set by the Office of Foreign Assets Control on payments to Cuba and directed further questions to the trip's organizer, California-based Cuba Cultural Travel.
Cuba Cultural Travel and SimplyCLE did not respond to requests for comment by deadline.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readBrazil Is Quickly Becoming a Vital LatAm Market for Greenberg Traurig, Other US Law Firms
5 minute read'Would've Been Snoring Without Ya': Fort Lauderdale Jury Awards $4.5 Million in Condo Investment Spat
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250