10 South Florida Cities Challenge State Law Preempting Local Gun Regulations
The lawsuit alleges it's unconstitutional for the state to enforce penalties against local officials who try to enact gun regulations.
April 02, 2018 at 02:48 PM
3 minute read
Ten South Florida municipalities banded together Monday to challenge a state law preempting locally adopted gun restrictions.
The lawsuit against Gov. Rick Scott and other state officials was filed in Leon Circuit Court about six weeks after the Parkland high school shooting. Weston led the litigation effort after the city's mayor, Daniel Stermer, was stymied in his desire to take action on gun control.
“I had to basically tell the commission they're not allowed to do it and, if they do it, they face all these penalties,” said Jamie Cole, city attorney for Weston and Miramar and managing director at Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman.
The penalties enacted by the state Legislature in 2011 after lobbying from the National Rifle Association include removal from office without a hearing, a fine up to $5,000 to be paid out of the official's pocket and unlimited lawsuits against a municipality by anyone claiming to be adversely affected by gun regulations.
“These onerous penalties are vindictive and expressly intended to be punitive in nature,” the lawsuit claims. ”As a result, the penalties deter and chill officials from taking any actions in the area of firearms and ammunition, even in those areas where such actions are (or may be) allowed.”
The municipalities allege the penalties are improper because they violate constitutional limitations on the governor's authority over municipal officers, conflict with elected officials' and municipalities' constitutionally granted immunity, and violate the right to petition and instruct local elected officials. The lawsuit also claims the penalties are arbitrary, unconstitutionally vague and overbroad.
Weston's lawsuit was joined by Miramar, Pompano Beach, Pinecrest, South Miami, Miami Gardens, Miami Beach, Coral Gables, Cutler Bay and Lauderhill. The plaintiffs include 31 elected officials in South Florida cities with a total population of 700,000, Cole said.
The governor's office did not respond to a request for comment on the lawsuit by deadline.
Cole said Weston decided to challenge the law after hearing from constituents after the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School on Feb. 14. Stermer, an attorney and Miami managing director of business consulting and restructuring firm Development Specialists Inc., was upset the city couldn't prohibit firearms in public buildings and parks.
“There were residents who came to speak, and they were very concerned about it,” Cole said. “They're concerned about gun safety. They believe cities should be doing things. They don't believe there should be one-size-fits-all regulations.”
Public agencies with gun-control measures in place in 2011 were forced to repeal them. For example, Palm Beach County banned guns in county government buildings and parks. Rural Groveland in Lake County banned celebratory gunfire.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Lawyers Speak Out: 'The President Had the Confidence to Retain Me'
Trending Stories
- 1As Uncertainty Hovers Over PGA Merger, LIV Golf Hires Entertainment Industry Veteran as Legal Chief
- 2$750K Settlement for 65-Year-Old in Case That Hinged on Age
- 3St. Thomas University Settles With Fired Professor Who Had Alleged Academic Freedom Violations and Discrimination
- 4Justices Ask If They Should Have Even Taken Nvidia’s Appeal of Investor Suit
- 5Trump Selects Matt Gaetz as Attorney General
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250