People don’t necessarily give up their ability to consent to sex — including sadomasochistic encounters — when placed under the legal conservatorship of others because they are considered unable to handle their affairs, the Connecticut Supreme Court has ruled.

Lawyers involved in the case had said they couldn’t recall any legal precedents in the country on whether mentally ill and disabled people can consent to sex or sadomasochism. The case, which attracted amicus briefs from organizations including the Connecticut Bar Association, Connecticut Probate Assembly, Connecticut Legal Services and the Connecticut Legal Rights Project, which represents people with mental illness.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]