Despite most of his criminal convictions being reversed, a Connecticut Appellate Court said the New Haven County Standing Committee, a subcommittee of the Bar Examining Committee still had the authority to pose questions about an attorney’s pre-suspension misconduct.

But during an evidentiary hearing for Charles B. Spadoni’s application for reinstatement, he allegedly refused to answer questions about any of his criminal charges and he maintained that he was innocent of any wrongdoing. Subsequently, the Standing Committee on Recommendations for Admission to the bar ultimately recommended that Spadoni’s reinstatement be denied, concluding that he lacked the requisite of good moral character to practice law and he refused to accept responsibility.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]