A federal judge on Monday rejected an attempt by lawyers for the far-right Oathkeepers group to toss out the heart of the federal government’s case against them: That they conspired to obstruct Congress’ formal certification of the election when they allegedly stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6.

U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta of the District of Columbia ruled that 17 Oathkeepers defendants must face charges of obstruction of an official proceeding and conspiracy to obstruct that proceeding. Mehta rejected arguments that the certification of the electoral college vote didn’t qualify as an “official proceeding” and that prosecutors’ description of their conduct didn’t violate that statute.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]