Here are the Latest Updates on Connecticut Courts' Responses to Coronavirus
The Connecticut courts have announced delays of jury selection and jury trials and federal courts have barred entry to individuals who have been in certain countries and communities during the past two weeks.
March 17, 2020 at 02:06 PM
3 minute read
Most Connecticut courts are staying open despite concerns about the spread of COVID-19 globally. But they have delayed jury selections and trials, and are urging people to conduct court-related business via phone.
The Connecticut Superior Court, Connecticut Appellate Court and the state's three federal courts have all announced coronavirus-related contingency plans.
But as of Tuesday afternoon, the Connecticut Supreme Court was still planning to hear oral arguments for its seventh session, which runs from March 24 through April 2.
The state's law libraries also announced Monday they'd be closed until further notice.
Connecticut Superior Courts
The Connecticut superior courts have delayed all future jury selections and trials through at least April 13. Juries sitting before the March 13 directive would continue those trials.
While all courts are open, the judicial branch announced that from March 16 through March 27 it would schedule and hear only matters identified as "priority 1 business functions." That includes criminal arraignments of defendants held in lieu of bond, all arraignments involving domestic violence cases, juvenile detention hearings, civil protection orders, termination of parental rights, and family orders of relief from abuse, among others.
Hartford Superior Court Administrative Judge David Sheridan issued his own directive on March 11.
That directive states that beginning March 13 and until further notice, all pretrial conferences, status conferences and trial management conferences would be conducted over the phone. He also said requests for continuance for up to three months—that are based on legitimate concerns over exposure to the virus—would be "automatically granted."
Appellate court
The Connecticut Appellate Court in Hartford announced Tuesday morning that oral arguments would not go forward in any of the cases scheduled to be heard from Tuesday through Thursday, which is the end of the sixth term. As of Tuesday, cases have not been scheduled for the court's seventh term, which starts April 6.
Connecticut federal courts
Like the state courts, the state's three federal courts in Bridgeport, Hartford and New Haven will also stop all new jury selections and jury trials until at least April 13. Trials already underway are set to continue.
In addition, unlike in the Superior Court system, Chief Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut Stefan Underhill issued a March 11 order barring entry of individuals who visited China, South Korea, Japan, Italy, Iran, New York's New Rochelle community, and any other location that has been under coronavirus-related quarantine in the past 14 days.
Related stories:
Justice Delayed? Lawyers Brace for Impact of 3-Month Continuances Amid Coronavirus Precautions
Coronavirus Is Slowing Courts. But What About the Right to a Speedy Trial?
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Severe Emotional Distress': DC Judge Finds Iran Liable in 3 US Hostage-Takings
2 minute read'You Are Not Alone': 120 Sex Assault Victims Plan to Sue Sean 'Diddy' Combs
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250