Sourcing Your Next Great Hire
Every general counsel understands the importance of hiring the right people. Take your time. And do your best to take control of the process.
May 03, 2018 at 11:21 AM
3 minute read
Attention general counsel: When you have an opening to fill, are you sure that the person you really want to hire even knows you are hiring?
While there will always be more attorneys seeking in-house positions than there are openings, sourcing a great hire is more challenging than ever for several reasons:
- Unemployment among attorneys with in-house experience is historically low.
- Desirable candidates are busier than ever and therefore less likely to be monitoring job boards.
- Internal recruiters in your HR department struggle when asked to identify and proactively contact the right currently employed prospects.
- Your company may be highly resistant to using a search firm for openings below the C-suite level due to HR policies controlling those engagements.
To clarify, this month's advice is not about the vetting process. Whether or not you use a search firm to add its judgment and advice, ultimately you have to make the selection. Vetting is not nearly as nuanced or challenging as others in my line of work want you to believe. Winners reveal themselves and become obvious to everyone.
If you are not seeing winners who match what you need in a critical hire, don't settle. My self-serving, but I believe correct, advice is to use a legal search firm. This may require a political battle with your colleagues in HR. If your CEO will allow it, though, the easier path is to simply pay for the recruiter from your law department budget and take ownership of the engagement.
Make no mistake: A search firm is your best option for getting access to so-called passive candidates, the ones who otherwise would not be aware of your opening. Proactive and expert sourcing is the most important part of a search firm's value proposition.
If search firm use is simply not going to happen for you, here are two other suggestions for improving your access to winners:
- Consider hiring from the ranks of your best outside law firms when possible. While this means forgoing someone with in-house experience, you likely know who you value. And you may even be able to lure someone over to start out on a secondment basis to see if the fit is right.
- Invest your own time and take a DIY approach. Don't just rely on your internal recruiter. Post the opening on your LinkedIn news feed. Email the opening to your contact network. I know one general counsel who even offered her company's skybox for a concert as a thank you for a winning candidate referral.
Every general counsel understands the importance of hiring the right people.
Take your time. And do your best to take control of the process.
Mike Evers recruits attorneys for corporate legal departments throughout the United States. Visit www.everslegal.com. His firm also offers experienced in-house counsel to companies on an adjunct basis.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStreamlining Privilege Logging in the AI Era: Navigating Ethics and Complexities in Modern Litigation
Want to Get Ahead in Your Career? Find a Truth Teller
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250