• State v. Xenidis

    Publication Date: 2019-07-17
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Wallace
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Matthew F. Hicks Dep't of Justice, Wilmington, DE for the state.
    for defendant: Michael W. Modica, The Law Office of Michael W. Modica, Wilmington, DE for defendant.

    Case Number: D68637

    In this sentencing matter, defendant was prohibited from collaterally attacking a prior conviction in another state for driving under the influence of alcohol.

  • DiStefano v. KW Solar Sols., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2019-07-17
    Practice Area: Expert Witnesses
    Industry: Construction | Energy
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Scott
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Blake A. Bennett and Christopher H. Lee, Cooch and Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Robert D. Goldberg, Biggs and Battaglia, Wilmington, DE for defendants.

    Case Number: D68632

    Plaintiffs' expert could testify as to the presence of mold in plaintiffs' home, given the expert's training, certifications, and experience in the mold inspection industry.

  • Conduent State Healthcare, LLC v. AIG Specialty Ins. Co.

    Publication Date: 2019-07-17
    Practice Area: Insurance Law
    Industry: Health Care
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Johnston
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robin L. Cohen and Keith McKenna, McKool Smith, P.C., New York, NY; Jennifer C. Wasson and Carla M. Jones, Potter, Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: John L. Reed, Matthew Denn, and Harrison S. Carpenter, DLA Piper LLP, Wilmington, DE, Robert S. Harrell, Mayer Brown LLP, Houston, TX for defendants.

    Case Number: D68631

    Defendants obligated to provide defense costs following state attorney general's issuance of a civil investigative demand to defendants' insured because the demand involved an investigation into Medicaid fraud and constituted a "demand for non-monetary relief" under the terms of defendants' policies.

  • Anderson v. General Motors, LLC

    Publication Date: 2019-07-17
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry: Automotive
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Butler
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Roland C. Anderson, pro se appellant.
    for defendant: Lori A. Brewington and Renee M. Mosley, Richards Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE for appellee.

    Case Number: D68630

    Motion to reopen workers' compensation claim properly denied where full evidentiary record demonstrated that employer continued to deny liability for employee's claim, previously dismissed by the courts.

  • Ravis v. Wal-Mart

    Publication Date: 2019-07-15
    Practice Area: Discovery | Premises Liability
    Industry: Retail
    Court: Connecticut Superior Court, New Haven J.D. at New Haven
    Judge: Judge Pierson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: CV 18-6082132

    Court Granted Defendant's Motion For Protective Order In Premises Liability Case

  • McIntyre v. Carbonaro

    Publication Date: 2019-07-15
    Practice Area: Discovery
    Industry: Legal Services
    Court: Connecticut Superior Court, Danbury J.D.
    Judge: Judge Krumeich
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: CV 17-6023825

    Court Granted Appellant's Motion for Protective Order in Part

  • Centerplan Construction Company, LLC v. City of Hartford

    Publication Date: 2019-07-15
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes | Damages
    Industry: Construction | State and Local Government
    Court: Connecticut Superior Court, Hartford J.D. Complex Litigation Docket
    Judge: Judge Moukawsher
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: CV-16-6069748

    Court Limits Opposing Parties to Proving Damages in Accordance with Contract in Dispute Over Failed Design-Build Agreement

  • E.S. v. C.D.

    Publication Date: 2019-07-15
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court Chancery Division
    Judge: Judge Steinhart
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: FV-02-1094-19

    Plaintiff applied for a final restraining order against defendant, alleging defendant committed the predicate acts of harassment, cyber-harassment, and terroristic threats.

  • In re Q.R.D.

    Publication Date: 2019-07-15
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Dubow
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0820

    Trial court properly terminated father's parental rights because the record supported the trial court's finding that child's preferred outcome was unascertainable at the time of the hearing, there was no conflict between the child's best interest and legal interests, representation by child's attorney satisfied the requirements of 23 Pa. C.S. §2313(a) and stepfather provided clear and convincing evidence to support termination. Affirmed.

  • Matenkoski v. Greer

    Publication Date: 2019-07-15
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry: Automotive | State and Local Government
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Stabile
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0818

    Trial judge properly granted a preliminary injunction barring appellants from operating an automobile repair and restoration business at their residence because the commercial business was in violation of local zoning ordinances and the time and manner restrictions were well within the trial court's discretion. Affirmed.