Resources

In the ever-changing electronic world that we live in, monitoring and preserving data becomes more and more challenging for organizations. New and emerging communication trends potentially pose a threat as employees and associates conduct business on new platforms and personal devices outside of the office.

While this can be intimidating, being aware of new trends and addressing what is acceptable with employees can make it an easier task.

Download this white paper and learn how to keep abreast of communication trends and solutions that address new preservation challenges for your company, including:

• 3 best practices to avoid preservation pitfalls
• An overview of how communication is evolving in business
• What kind of data is considered to be in an organization’s control

What responsibility do lawyers really have to understand the technology they use?  

According to the American Bar Association’s (ABA) revised Model Rule1.1, and specifically Comment 8, most state-specific guidelines have removed an attorney’s ability to claim that he or she lacks requisite technological information or expertise. Technological incompetence is not just a practice-of-law issue; it’s an ethical one.

Law firm’s and attorney’s responsibility is to be aware through self-education or guidance from a technology partner. That responsibility extends beyond basic software into the realm of data protection and safeguarding sensitive information.

Download this white paper and learn how cloud-based software helps you meet ethical duties associated with technology. It covers:

• The implications of Model Rule 1.1, Comment 8 for law firms and attorneys
• How the cloud helps you meet satisfactory security responsibilities
• Key benefits cloud software offers

Since receiving the courts’ seal of approval, technology-assisted review (“TAR”) has proven to be a better way to get through massive amounts of data in a more efficient and cost-effective manner. The main benefits of using TAR are the reduction in effort and costs, while simultaneously improving accuracy in eDiscovery.

However, with all its advantages, TAR, as most use it today, has limitations. It requires high-rate senior attorneys to train the system, training processes that may reduce accuracy in some cases, and the need to re-review certain documents that can result in longer discovery times.

To overcome these limitations, many legal professionals are now turning to continuous active learning, otherwise known as TAR 2.0. Learn how TAR is evolving to become even more efficient and accurate.

Download this white paper that covers:

• How TAR 1.0 works
• How TAR 2.0 differs and improves upon 1.0
• How TAR 2.0 will further benefit your eDiscovery efforts