Heath Care and Employment Focus Spells Busy Times for Epstein Becker & Green
The 250-attorney firm, which recently inked an international alliance with Deloitte Legal, has a practice mix that's placed it in high demand amid the COVID-19 crisis.
March 27, 2020 at 03:33 PM
7 minute read
While many full-service law firms contend that their diverse offerings keep them well-hedged in times of upheaval, it's fair to say that many of their practices have stumbled into a quiet phase.
Other, more specialized players are finding that the current economic and public health crisis sparked by the coronavirus plays directly to their practice strengths.
That's the case for 250-attorney Epstein Becker & Green, which offers clients a dual focus on health care and employment law. The timing of the firm's 10-month old alliance with Deloitte Legal has also proved fortuitous, giving clients access to the Big Four firm's worldwide capabilities to help navigate an emergency that's indifferent to national boundaries.
Washington, D.C.-based chair Mark Lutes; Newark, New Jersey-based managing director Jim Flynn; and New York and New Jersey-based national employment, labor and workforce management steering committee chair David Garland spoke with ALM this week about what their workload currently looks like.
I imagine it's been a very busy couple of weeks for all of you.
Jim Flynn: It really has been. Our core areas of labor, employment and health care are at the nexus of what's going on here. And our lawyers have been in extremely high demand, simply for health care entities to continue to function, protect their own workers, protect patients and deal with all of these new things.
Do you have any specific examples?
Mark Lutes: I think there's two phases that we have a unique position in. One is the immediate needs across our client base. The second is those that are beginning to emerge: we're hearing a lot of interest, particularly from investors in health care and some of the providers that are online, in what the post-corona or less-acute phase is going to look like. There is an immediate short-term need to work with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to get what CMS would call regulatory flexibility, so that operations can continue even in situations where normal access points to caregivers aren't available. We are fielding innumerable questions now from investors and from providers about how they should prepare to access the funding that has been made available by Congress to eligible health care providers for health care-related expenses or lost revenues that are attributed directly attributable to the coronavirus.
JF: Let me use the telemedicine, telehealth example. Mark talked about making sure that regulatory-side people are doing it the right way, getting the right approvals. More importantly, from the client perspective, is being able to get paid for it. What we bring to that is then the ability to say on the labor and employment side, "Is your staff trained to do it? Is this helping and increasing social distancing? To the extent that you're in a unionized setting, is there anything we need to do to make sure that we can implement this and have your employees trained to do it, whether those are physicians, nurses, physician assistants or nurse practitioners?"
When did you realize the potential for disruption to your client base posed by COVID-19? And did you take any measures to ramp up?
JF: We posted one of our first articles about the potential impact of COVID-19 in January, so we were a little ahead of the curve.
David Garland: A lot of firms have put together what they refer to as resource centers. But because of the nature of our firm, our resource center combines probably more material on the labor and employment and the healthcare side than any firm. What Deloitte brings to us, as well, is the global perspective on what's happening. We did a webinar about 10 days ago, where we had Deloitte speakers from, among other places, China. One of the things the speaker from China told us was that public schools just reopened in his region in Shanghai. We're trying to anticipate some of the things we're now seeing in the United States, so we're trying to provide some notion of where the light may be at the end, and we were doing that at a time before a lot of these lockdowns were in place.
Because of all the demand right now and the fact that this crisis hits on so many of the firm's key areas, do you have the expertise you need in order to serve your clients? Are there prospects for further hiring at the moment?
ML: We expect that there will be additional partners interested in joining the platform, who have clients that have the types of needs that we can address. They have clients that know that they're going to have to interface with CMS. Going forward, they know that they're going to want to access government funds, just to give two examples.
JF: On the flip side of that, because we're not a general service firm, we're not threatened and we frequently partner with other law firms as well. We don't have any problem coordinating the delivery of services and advice for clients who may use others in different areas that we don't deal with.
ML: If you were to do a survey of large corporate transactional firms, you'd get a great response as to how comfortable they've grown over the years in reaching out for us to fill in where there's a need for in-depth expertise in labor and employment and in health care.
Are you well-positioned to withstand a potential sustained economic downturn? Are there any particular preparations that you find yourself making to prepare for those contingencies?
JF: Look, we understand that many firms, many clients are going to face financial difficulties. But, frankly, we're open and doing business, even if not in our offices, for existing clients. We've taken on a lot of new clients and we're doing business with both over the last couple of weeks. We don't have any current plans for layoffs of lawyers or staff. Obviously, we're prudent and we'll continue to monitor the situation, both its intensity and its duration. But I think we'll get through this period, as we have other difficult periods in the past.
Were there any inquiries or needs from clients that you didn't initially anticipate but had to quickly get up to speed on?
JF: Certainly, we all knew that anything that was antiviral or vaccine-related would continue and have to move forward. But what we saw was that social distancing policies were complicating study protocols because a lot of studies require people to come into places and check in. It wasn't top of mind for most people, even for most of our health care and life science folks.
DG: We're always constantly advising our clients on changes in employment law, but now we're doing it at warp speed. Almost every day, there's a new development coming out of Congress. Today, the Senate's gonna be passing this additional legislation. And our folks are going through it right now, analyzing it so that we can tell our clients immediately what the practical impact is on them. I don't know that that's necessarily new, but the speed at which we have to do it and be able to adjust and distill it into practical advice, that's something that we are doing constantly.
This interview has been edited for clarity and length.
|Read More
After Deloitte Alliance, Epstein Becker Reels In a Big Fish From Proskauer
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigation, Health Care, Telecom, Antitrust Practices Fuel Lateral Hiring in DC
3 minute readThe Crowell & Moring Paralegal Who Made History Refereeing at the Paris Olympics
3 minute readFoley & Lardner Opens North Carolina Office After Scooping Up Life Sciences Team From K&L Gates
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 2Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 3Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 4Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 5The Law Firm Disrupted: Big Law Profits Vs. Political Values
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.