DLA Piper Leads Big Law in Social Media as More Firms Shun Facebook: Report
New research from Good2bSocial finds law firms getting savvier with digital marketing, but with plenty still to master.
November 19, 2019 at 05:00 AM
5 minute read
DLA Piper outdid its competitors in digital marketing in 2019, according to a new report, while law firms in general are using Facebook far less and using LinkedIn, Instagram and paid social marketing more. Firms are also measuring the impact of their social marketing efforts more closely, the report found.
Consultancy Good2bSocial has released the annual report card, the Social Law Firm Index, since 2013, though this year it includes more firms than ever. The group measures law firms' social media reach, engagement, and marketing performance on their own websites and on public social media platforms.
The latest rankings, released Tuesday, place DLA Piper at No. 1, followed by White & Case, Norton Rose Fulbright, Baker McKenzie and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe.
Norton Rose Fullbright, which topped the overall rankings last year, came in first in 2019 when it came to "thought leadership," while Baker McKenzie led the pack in SEO optimization.
Ranked by their reach and engagement on individual platforms, Squire Patton Boggs was No. 1 for Twitter, Quarles & Brady for Facebook, Baker McKenzie for LinkedIn, Jones Day for YouTube and DLA Piper for Instagram.
By now, the researchers noted, major firms are already marketing themselves on most if not all of the major social media platforms. Now that adoption is widespread, the firms are beginning to get more sophisticated with usage, the report found.
Guy Alvarez, Good2bSocial's founder and CEO, said that more firms are taking advantage of automated marketing systems such as Hubspot or Pardot to improve management of leads and to fine-tune messaging by office and practice.
He also said the most successful firms are beginning to dig deeper into performance metrics to gauge their return on investment.
"Law firms are actively doing things on social media, but very few know how to measure ROI and how to use [social media] as a marketing campaign to get the results they want," Alvarez said in an interview. "Before you figure out what your ROI is, you need to know what your business purposes are."
He said firms typically use social media for one or more of four reasons: to build brand awareness, to generate more leads, to provide more value to clients through cross-selling practice areas and to help differentiate themselves from their competition.
Each of those goals can require a different strategy and a different platform, he said, depending on the audience and the desired outcome.
Alvarez also said that although adoption rates are high, law firms often lag behind other professional service industries, particularly the Big Four, when it comes to effective usage.
"A lot of firms are still using social media as sort of a one-way content marketing tool," he said. "The ones that struggle are just putting up promotional content. Social media is meant to engage and be social."
Alvarez said the firms that struggle the most tend to have a couple of things in common. First, they usually make decisions that are not based on data. They miss out on opportunities to course-correct or change strategies if a campaign doesn't bear fruit. If you don't check the data, he said, how will you know if it is working?
Another common pitfall is a basic lack of content—whether on a firm's website, within lawyer biographies or on social platforms. Having content that is robust, useful to clients and search-friendly can go a long way in driving traffic to a firm's site, he said.
While social media can be a marketing blessing, Alvarez also said there are also elements that can make it dangerous.
"If some bad news about your firm is out there, it will get around quick," he said. "Getting on top of that can be difficult." He also said that firms can be concerned about what their attorneys might write that could come back to haunt them (see: Frank Aquila).
Alvarez said more and more firms are putting social media training into their professional development programs and hiring consultants to work with attorneys to maximize their marketing advantage and avoid social media peril.
While many of the latest trends aren't brand new, there were some elements from the 2019 report that Alvarez didn't see coming, he said.
He said he was surprised at how many firms had "jumped on the Instagram bandwagon." Firms such as DLA Piper and White & Case have done a good job, he said, of telling stories on the platform and even using it as a recruiting tool.
On the flip side, "I was surprised at how much and how quickly firm usage of Facebook has declined," Alvarez said. "Cambridge Analytica and privacy issues helped move that along. We saw some decline last year, but this year was a huge drop. Some firms have given up on Facebook completely."
For top-ranked Good2bSocial firm DLA Piper, which spent years beating back a Facebook lawsuit when Mark Zuckerberg was at his peak, that may just be the icing on the cake.
Download the full report here.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Still More to Be Had': New Chicago Law Firm Leaders Have High Growth Aspirations
6 minute readKirkland and Quinn Emanuel Spar Over Disclosure of Litigation Funder Contracts in Patent Suit Against Google
This Reed Smith Partner Wants to Make Sure You Don't Get Sued for Your Super Bowl Ad
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250