X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Morrson Foerster sign(Photo: Jason Doiy/ALM) Morrison & Foerster sign. (Photo: Jason Doiy/ALM)

A lawyer for one of the Jane Doe plaintiffs pursuing claims that Morrison & Foerster discriminates against pregnant women and mothers contends the law firm is seeking to damage her client’s reputation by asking her new employer for personnel records.

This premium content is locked for
The American Lawyer subscribers only.

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?
Interested in customizing your subscription with Law.com All Access?
Contact our Sales Professionals at 1-855-808-4530 or send an email to groupsales@alm.com to learn more.

Ross Todd

Ross Todd is bureau chief of The Recorder in San Francisco. He writes about litigation in the Bay Area and around California. Contact Ross at rtodd@alm.com. On Twitter: @Ross_Todd.

More from this author

 

Electronic DiscoveryBook

The use of e-mail and electronically stored data has fundamentally changed the discovery process and the judicial standards for what is a reasonable discovery r...
Get More Information

The Mansfield Rule & Its Impact on Talent & Business Development

Is your firm Mansfield Certified? What about your competitors? How does your firm compare? Which Legal Departments are supporting the Mansfield Rule? Access Legal Compass to see gender breakdowns of partners, associates, and other key law firm personnel, including side-by-side comparisons.
Get More Information

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2019 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.