The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a jury verdict finding that the U.S. Polo Association did not infringe on a Ralph Lauren trademark. The appeals court also found that New York federal Judge George Daniels properly excluded from evidence the so-called "Ralph Rip-Off" document, which purported to show intent to use the Lauren mark unfairly. Each of the polo group logos at issue depicts a pair of mounted players known as the "double horsemen marks."
March 06, 2008 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A jury verdict finding that the U.S. Polo Association did not infringe on a Ralph Lauren trademark has been upheld by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
The appeals court also rejected claims by the holder of the Lauren mark that Southern District of New York Judge George Daniels erred in admitting evidence of settlement negotiations.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
