A municipality's banning of porn shops and other adult-oriented businesses from a redevelopment zone does not necessarily run afoul of the First Amendment, a Burlington County judge has ruled. The ban is content-neutral, serves a substantial government interest and allows for alternate means of obtaining adult materials, Superior Court Judge John Sweeney said, granting summary judgment on Dec. 10 in Township of Cinnaminson v. Bertino , BUR-L-2014-07.
December 14, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A municipality’s banning of porn shops and other adult-oriented businesses from a redevelopment zone does not necessarily run afoul of the First Amendment, a Burlington County judge has ruled.
The ban is content-neutral, serves a substantial government interest and allows for alternate means of obtaining adult materials, Superior Court Judge John Sweeney said, granting summary judgment on Dec. 10 in Township of Cinnaminson v. Bertino, BUR-L-2014-07.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
