The New York judge who ordered 46 defendants detained when no one would acknowledge owning a cell phone that rang in his courtroom intends to appeal his recommended removal to New York state's high court. Judge Robert M. Restaino continued to serve on the bench Wednesday. The Court of Appeals typically suspends judges with pay when they formally appeal removal recommendations to the court.
November 30, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The New York judge who ordered 46 defendants detained when no one would acknowledge owning a cell phone that rang in his courtroom intends to appeal his recommended removal to the Court of Appeals.
Attorney Terrence M. Connors said Wednesday that Judge Robert M. Restaino “deeply regrets and sincerely apologizes” for his actions on March 11, 2005.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
