At one time or another, many corporations will need to examine their options in conducting, through in-house or outside counsel, an internal investigation. With the recent issuance of Formal Opinion No. 737 by the New York County Lawyers' Association Committee on Professional Ethics, it appears that the use of pretexting or dissembling is not only legally restricted, but also ethically constrained, says attorney Bridget M. Rohde.
September 25, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
At one time or another, many corporations will need to examine their options in conducting, through in-house or outside counsel, an internal investigation. With the recent issuance of Formal Opinion No. 737 (NYCLA Opinion No. 737) by the New York County Lawyers’ Association Committee on Professional Ethics, it appears that the use of pretexting or dissembling is not only legally restricted, but also ethically constrained.
BACKGROUND
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
