What do federal judges think about the quality of many lawyers' appellate advocacy? For at least some judges, the answer seems to be: Not much. As evidence, just consider the points made by three federal appellate judges at a recent panel of the Federal Bar Association's annual convention, as noted by commentator and litigator Howard J. Bashman. Among the criticisms: a lack of clarity in appellate briefs.
September 17, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Related: Bashman Archive
While at the Federal Bar Association’s annual meeting and convention this month, I attended a session at which three relatively new federal appellate judges spoke at length about how lawyers can improve their appellate advocacy.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
