In an ongoing series on the changing legal landscape for defamation, Law.com contributor Kevin Allen explores the issue in a three part series titled “Digital Defamation” that addresses current developments in the law of defamation, particularly those involving allegations of defamation in the electronic media. Look next month for the last article in the series.

When Congress passed the Communications Decency Act (CDA), 47 U.S.C. � 230, in 1996, it made a tradeoff. Congress had the choice whether to permit Internet service providers (ISPs) to be held liable for damages caused by content posted by third parties, or whether to free ISPs from the threat of such liability and thereby foster the free flow of information over the Internet. At that time, with the Internet still in a relatively nascent stage of development, Congress came down in favor of immunizing ISPs from liability, and did so — intentionally or unintentionally — in sweeping fashion.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]