Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Giving quick effect to the U.S. Supreme Court’s most recent business-friendly antitrust ruling, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the dismissal of a suit brought by a beauty supplies company that said it was the victim of a “group boycott” by distributors of so-called “salon-only” products.

In its 20-page opinion in Cosmetic Gallery Inc. v. Schoeneman Corp., a unanimous three-judge panel found that the plaintiff failed to show the existence of a group boycott because its evidence “falls short of excluding the possibility that the distributors acted independently.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.