A long-running lawsuit accusing Bayer Corp. of blocking generic versions of an antibiotic can continue, the state Supreme Court ruled Friday. The decision reaffirms the court's 2005 ruling that Wisconsin consumers can bring antitrust lawsuits against out-of-state practices if the conduct substantially impacts them. The suit alleges Wisconsin consumers paid higher prices for Cipro as a result of an unlawful settlement between Bayer and three generic drug manufacturers.
July 16, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A long-running lawsuit accusing Bayer Corp. of blocking generic versions of an antibiotic can continue, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled Friday.
The decision reaffirms the court’s 2005 ruling that Wisconsin consumers can bring antitrust lawsuits against out-of-state practices if the conduct substantially impacts them.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
