Nike USA is suing a Miami promotions company and the owner of a Miami Beach mansion for allegedly failing to deliver on a promise to host Super Bowl week parties and events. Oregon-based Nike brought suit in Florida's Miami-Dade Circuit Court last month for the return of $200,000 paid for use of the house, plus attorney fees and damages. The suit claims the defendants knew or should have known when they signed a contract with Nike that the mansion could not be used for commercial purposes.
June 20, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Nike USA wants its money back from a Miami promotions company and the owner of a Miami Beach mansion for allegedly failing to deliver on a promise to host Super Bowl week parties and events.
Oregon-based Nike sued Drama Sports and Daniel Davidson in Florida’s Miami-Dade Circuit Court last month for the return of $200,000 paid for use of the house, plus attorney fees and damages. The suit claims breach of contract, rescission, fraud in the inducement and unjust enrichment.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
