A New Jersey judge improperly presided at a criminal trial in which his wife was an alternate juror, but in view of the Code of Judicial Conduct’s lack of clear guidance, he should not be disciplined, says a state Supreme Court committee.

The Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct, in an opinion released June 1, found that New Jersey Superior Court Judge Andrew Smithson acted in good faith but contrary to the spirit of Canon 2 of the code, which says judges should avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]