A Manhattan judge has rejected a challenge by eight parents of New York City school children to the Department of Education's ban on the possession of cell phones by students. In a joint declaratory judgment action and Article 78 proceeding, the petitioners in Price v. New York City Board of Education claimed that the city's decision to ban the possession of cell phones -- as opposed to the use of cell phones -- lacked a rational basis.
May 09, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A Manhattan judge has rejected a challenge by eight parents of New York City school children to the Department of Education’s ban on the possession of cell phones by students.
In a joint declaratory judgment action and Article 78 proceeding, the petitioners claimed that the city’s decision to ban the possession of cell phones — as opposed to the use of cell phones — lacked a rational basis.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
