One of the indicted former name partners of New York's Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman has moved to dismiss federal criminal charges against him. In motion papers filed Friday, Steven G. Schulman took issue with the government's characterization of alleged payments as "kickbacks." He also claimed the government's case is deficient because it fails to demonstrate how the lead plaintiffs' interests diverged from those of other class members.
April 30, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
One of the indicted former name partners of New York’s Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman has moved to dismiss federal criminal charges against him.
Steven G. Schulman, along with the firm and fellow name partner David J. Bershad, was indicted last May by Los Angeles federal prosecutors for allegedly paying illegal kickbacks to individuals serving as lead plaintiffs in securities class actions lawsuits brought by the firm. All three have pleaded not guilty.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
