The Pennsylvania Supreme Court will consider where an attorney’s law practice ends and entrepreneurial business practices begin in an appeal by attorneys held liable under the state’s consumer protection law for their partner’s misappropriation of a client’s settlement.

The justices heard arguments Monday in Beyers v. Richmond on whether the Superior Court correctly found that Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law applies to an attorney’s conduct in collecting and distributing settlement proceeds.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]