The erroneous admission of damaging lay opinion testimony about an attorney’s alleged insurance fraud led a federal appeals court to reverse his conviction on several counts Wednesday.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals vacated disgraced attorney Solomon Kaplan’s conviction on five counts related to an insurance fraud scheme because lay opinion by a cooperating witness was improperly allowed as to Kaplan’s knowledge of a massive auto accident insurance scheme.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]