Matricia Moore's allegation that she suffered adverse employment actions and was ultimately terminated by Consolidated Edison Co. easily survived summary judgment under the standard set forth last year by the U.S. Supreme Court in the Burlington Northern case. But Southern District of New York Judge Paul Crotty said that the "broader" standard also helped Moore win a close call on her claim that minimal salary increases could support her allegations of retaliation at the summary judgment stage.
March 23, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The U.S. Supreme Court’s generous standard for permitting retaliation allegations to go forward in employment discrimination claims has helped spare part of a woman’s case from dismissal.
Matricia Moore’s allegation that she suffered adverse employment actions and was ultimately terminated by Consolidated Edison Co. easily survived summary judgment under the standard set forth last year in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. White, 126 S.Ct. 2405 (2006).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
Duane Morris seeks an associate with 3-4 years of experience to join its Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Group in its Philadelp...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
