Even at the Supreme Court, a picture — or in this case, a video — can be worth a thousand words. Or more.

In the case of Scott v. Harris, which was argued Monday, justices debated whether Coweta County, Ga., sheriff’s deputy Timothy Scott used reasonable force in 2001 when he rammed his vehicle into a Cadillac he was pursuing during a high-speed chase. The driver, Victor Harris, who at the time was 19, had been targeted for speeding. Scott’s maneuver was intended to end the chase, and it did. Harris’ car careened down an embankment, leaving him paralyzed from the neck down. Harris sued, and Scott claimed he had qualified immunity — which the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied him.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]