A lawyer for AT&T argued before a skeptical Supreme Court on Wednesday that Microsoft Corp. is violating its patent on speech encoding technology when it sends its Windows software overseas to be copied and placed on personal computers. Two lower federal courts ruled in favor of AT&T. The case has implications beyond the technology sector and, depending on the outcome, could encourage U.S. manufacturers to establish more research and development facilities abroad.
February 22, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A lawyer for AT&T argued before a skeptical Supreme Court on Wednesday that Microsoft Corp. is violating one of its patents when it sends its Windows software overseas to be copied and placed on personal computers.
The case has implications beyond the technology sector and, depending on the outcome, could encourage U.S. manufacturers to establish more research and development facilities abroad.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
