For many months, sound and fury had been building about the Thompson memo. Organizations ranging from the American Civil Liberties Union to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce had called for reform of the document, which laid out the factors that prosecutors must consider when deciding whether to charge a corporation with a crime. To its detractors, the memo was a symbol of prosecutorial overstepping. They charged that it eroded the attorney-client privilege and trampled the rights of individuals. In December, deputy attorney general Paul McNulty gave the critics what they wanted: a major shift in U.S. Department of Justice policy.

Lost in the discussion about what to do next was the story of the origin of the memo. It starts with a veteran New York prosecutor who participated in the creation of the memo eight years ago and today is running the hard-nosed prosecution of KPMG, where the memo has taken center stage.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]