Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
People who republish defamatory content online cannot be held liable for defamation even if they were warned about it, the California Supreme Court decided Monday. The decision marked a victory for Internet free speech advocates, who said it reaffirmed the proper interpretation of �230 of the federal Communications Decency Act. Writing for the court, Justice Carol Corrigan said the statute "serves to protect online freedom of expression and to encourage self-regulation, as Congress intended."
November 22, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS