Under an eagerly awaited ruling by New York’s highest court, plaintiffs and defendants in cases alleging injuries caused by chemical exposure will need to carefully assess the amount of the chemical to which the plaintiff was exposed.

In Parker v. Mobil Oil Corp., 2006 WL 2945397 (N.Y., Oct. 17, 2006), the Court of Appeals refused to require a plaintiff to prove the exact quantity of his exposure, but made clear that there must be a concrete scientific foundation for proof that the chemical caused his injuries. The court held that expert opinions that are “subjective” or “conclusory,” or that are not based on “a scientific expression” of the plaintiff’s exposure, are not sufficient to prove that the chemical caused the claimed injuries.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]