Recently, the publishers of the Oxford English Dictionary and the Merriam-Webster dictionary added the word “Google” to their respective dictionaries. Both dictionaries defined the word as a verb roughly meaning to use the Google search engine to obtain information on the Internet. While this level of prominence for a brand name might be a marketer’s dream, it is a trademark owner’s nightmare.
Once a trademark enters the public vernacular, whether as a noun, verb or adjective, there is a great likelihood that the trademark will become a generic term that covers an entire category of goods or services regardless of source. And when that happens, the trademark is deemed generic and loses its statutory protection, meaning that others, including competitors, can use the mark to identify their own goods and services. (See 15 U.S.C. � 1064(3).) Only if the trademark owner promptly takes well measured affirmative steps can this nightmare be averted.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]