The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the notion that the same 10 jurors must vote the same on each question listed on a special interrogatory, calling a mixed vote on interrogatories “irrelevant” to the final verdict.

In Fritz v. Wright, the 6-1 opinion reversed a split three-judge Superior Court panel that ordered a new trial in a personal injury case. The Superior Court ruled that in applying the five-sixths rule — meaning that only five-sixths of the jury must agree in order for a verdict to be valid — the majority of jurors must be the same for all the interrogatories.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]