In Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White , the Supreme Court held that the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is broader than Title VII's anti-discrimination provision, resolving differences among the circuit courts of appeal over what constitutes actionable retaliation. Jenner & Block partners Carla J. Rozycki and David K. Haase examine the history of the case, the significance of the ruling and its impact on employers.
August 02, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
In Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White, 548 U.S. –, No. 05-259 (June 22, 2006), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e-3(a) is broader than Title VII’s anti-discrimination provision, resolving differences among the circuit courts of appeal over what constitutes actionable retaliation.
Specifically, the Court addressed:
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
