How a federal judge in Trenton, N.J., rules in a patent infringement case could decide the future of online dispute resolution. The outcome of Cybersettle v. National Arbitration Forum, Inc. , 04-CV-4744 will affect the ability -- not only of NAF but also other dispute-resolution providers -- to enter the online field. Several companies that once offered the service have stopped in the face of the Cybersettle patent and the company's efforts to enforce it.
July 10, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
How a federal judge in Trenton, N.J., rules in a patent infringement case could decide the future of online dispute resolution.
The case pits Cybersettle, the White Plains, N.Y., leader in the field, against National Arbitration Forum (NAF), a Minnesota-based company hired to administer New Jersey’s No Fault Automobile Insurance Personal Injury Protection (PIP).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
