When Edward Ritti learned on the morning of his move that, despite a paid reservation, U-Haul was unable to give him a truck, his anger resonated long after. After learning he was far from alone in his distress, Ritti filed a proposed consumer class action alleging that U-Haul breaches its contracts. Now a federal judge has hit the brakes, ruling that because Ritti's claim hinges on specific details of his interactions with U-Haul, he cannot function as a "typical" representative of a nationwide class.
May 02, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
When Edward Ritti was told on the morning of his move that U-Haul was unable to provide him with a truck — despite his paid reservation made over the phone a few days before — his anger over the inconvenience he claims he suffered resonated long after.
Ritti decided to file a nationwide class action.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
